Ph.d., Associate dean of the University of California Riverside´s College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Co‐Director of Global Health institute - University of California
Policy Advice
This report assesses the targets in the OWG’s Final Outcome Document from 19 July 2014. This builds upon the information presented in similar documents which the Copenhagen Consensus Center released...
Read more
The Copenhagen Consensus has updated our benefit-cost assessment of UN Post-2015 Millennium Development Goals for the 12th session of the Open Working Group. The Copenhagen Consensus will present...
Perspective Paper
Anil Deolalikar provided a Perspective Paper in response to the Copenhagen Consensus Assessment Paper on Hunger and Malnutrition.
By Anil Deolalikar, a Perspective Paper in response to the Copenhagen Consensus research by Sue Horton, Harold Alderman, and Juan A. Rivera.
In 2004 and 2008, the Copenhagen Consensus Center held two major projects that helped to shape overseas development spending and philanthropic decisions for years to come. The third Copenhagen Consensus was the latest iteration of our ongoing work to prioritize the best solutions.
In 2015, the UN's Millennium Development Goals are expiring and the international community will set new goals. The Post-2015 Consensus brings together the world’s top economists, NGOs, international agencies and businesses to identify the goals with the greatest benefit-to-cost ratio for the next development agenda.
The second Copenhagen Consensus took place 25-30 May in Copenhagen. Once again, our Expert Panel tackled the question, Imagine you had $75 billion to donate to worthwhile causes. What would you do, and where should we start? The Panel released a prioritized list recommending how best to tackle ten of the world's most pressing issues.
